Oliver
Ressler, the Austrian “artist and activist” is in fact neither.
His projects are not artworks but strictly political advertising
campaigns, which sadly are of the preachy, guilt-ridden, accusatory,
self-righteous and holier-than-thou persuasion. They're being
sponsored by art-hating art institutes, whose bourgeoisie self-image
drives them towards constant apologetic yielding before the
supposedly combatant activist. They're also always designed in fine,
elegant, European finish that is supposedly meant to operate as a
Trojan horse within affluent, spectacular, touristic public space but
in fact integrates in it, complements it, collaborates with it. He
presents those projects from his laptop in the safe confines of a
gallery talk to the converted, this time round in Tel Aviv's University Gallery (as part of a group exhibition in which both him and myself participate, entitled “Anti-Anti”, curated by Hadas Kedar).
Big headed? Another wall text by Oliver Ressler |
After
the presentation, I asked him whether his
choice to work within the artworld is strictly pragmatic as that is
where he can find sponsorship to realise his projects, or if perhaps
there's more to it than that. The question flew right past his head
as he automatically lumped me with a cadre that probably baits him
from the left, that is to say, he thought I was an art-hating
activist who thinks political art is some non-influential
middle-class practice. He explained that “the confines of art can
be exceeded”, exposing himself as someone who was never confronted
with the possibility that it is actually the political whose confines
need to be exceeded, and summarised by stating that if the 11th
Documenta of 2002, based almost exclusively on political
documentaries, is considered the most important of our generation,
then there's “really no more discussion as to whether political art
has influence.” In other words, he presented a self-pat on the back
(by art-hating activists who won't hesitate to use the artworld's
guilt-ridden money) as an objective fact of life and declared, he the
activist who desires to 'raise questions' of all others, what are the
limits of discussion and what shouldn't and needn't be discussed
anymore.
Ressler
is not a malicious person, and not intentionally patronising and
self-righteous. He's simply an ultimate product of a despicably
condescending practice which lacks any shred of self-awareness, not
to mention self-criticism. I still somehow hope some of his work has
some positive influence, I just wish he would have the decency to
operate independently as a real activist instead of peddling on the
doorsteps of art institutions. His contribution to “Anti-Anti” is
a 10-meter wide wall text that says “no replastering, the structure
is rotten.” Is this what Ressler means by 'fighting'? To tell a
structure that it is rotten by the invitation and sponsorship of that
same structure?
Avi
Pitchon